It's crap. Both were shitty hires.
The chief reason can be found in the latest BCS rankings:
1 | LSU | 12-0 |
2 | Alabama | 11-1 |
3 | Oklahoma State | 10-1 |
4 | Stanford | 11-1 |
5 | Virginia Tech | 11-1 |
6 | Houston | 12-0 |
7 | Boise State | 10-1 |
8 | Arkansas | 10-2 |
9 | Oregon | 10-2 |
10 | Oklahoma | 9-2 |
11 | Kansas State | 9-2 |
12 | South Carolina | 10-2 |
13 | Michigan State | 10-2 |
14 | Georgia | 10-2 |
15 | Wisconsin | 10-2 |
16 | Michigan | 10-2 |
17 | Baylor | 8-3 |
18 | TCU | 9-2 |
19 | Nebraska | 9-3 |
20 | Clemson | 9-3 |
No team above is coached by someone who either totally flamed out in a previous college job (Rich Rod) or who was fired as a result of a scandal (Leach). Exactly zero -- which incidentally mirrors the chances either of these two coaches experiences a high level of success at their new schools. In fact, I implore anyone to find us a case where a coach was fired for poor performance or scandal and returned to coaching with any sort of acclaim afterward. Certainly, if you can, it would represent the exception.
These guys are retreads, much in the same way Ron Zook, who was canned last week after a 6-6 season at Illinois, was a retread when he was hired following a very mediocre run at Florida. And also in the same way Rick Neuheisel, also recently fired, was a retread when he was brought in by UCLA a few years removed from leaving Washington amid scandal.
Leach and Rich Rod, while they may be name coaches who carry with them a certain level of panache, did not make the conference 'tougher' and certainly were not 'major coups.' On the contrary, they were ill-conceived, short-sighted, not just bad, but terribly bad hires.
No comments:
Post a Comment